Legal Opinion
Chimney Hill Owners' Ass'n v. Antignani
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided September 12, 1978No. Nos. 264-77, 265-77 and 268-77PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hill, I.
The plaintiff brought these actions to recover assessments allegedly due on lots owned by the defendants in Chimney Hill in Wilmington, Vermont. After a trial, findings of fact, conclusions and an order were filed by the district court awarding judgment to the defendants. The plaintiff appeals.
Chimney Hill is a recreational second home development begun in 1966 by Chimney Hill Corporation. The area consists of in excess of 900 lots. Most owners in the development have purchased only one lot; approximately BO owners, however, including these defendants, hold multiple lots in Chimney…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Neponsit Property Owners' Ass'n v. Emigrant Industrial Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- McDonough v. WW Snow Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1973
- Lynda Lee Fashions, Inc. v. Sharp Offset Printing, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1976
- Welch v. BarrowsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
- Latchis v. JohnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Flying Diamond Oil Corp. v. Newton Sheep Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
- Rogers v. WatsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- City of Olympia v. PalzerWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Knight v. McCainMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- Toepper v. Brookwood Country Club Road Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.