Legal Opinion

In Re Raybeck

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 11, 2012No. 2010-876PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLynn, J.

The respondent, Bruce Raybeck, appeals an order of the Laconia Family Division (Sadler, J.), recommended by the Marital Master (Gamer, M.), ruling that the respondent was required to continue paying alimony to the petitioner, Judith Raybeck. We vacate and remand.

I

The relevant facts are as follows. The parties were divorced in Texas in August 2005 after a forty-two-year marriage. The respondent was awarded property in North Carolina and Texas, and the petitioner was awarded property in Laconia, New Hampshire. The divorce decree, based upon the parties’ agreement, obligated the respondent to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ArroyoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Gordon v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. State v. MichelsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  4. Kessler v. GleichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  5. Cook v. CookKentucky Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cleary v. ClearyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API