Legal Opinion
State v. Michelson
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided May 7, 2010No. 2009-386PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.
The defendant, Glenn Michelson, was found guilty, based upon stipulated facts, of possession of diazepam, a controlled drug. See RSA318-B:2,1 (2004) (amended 2008). He appeals an order of the Superior Court CArnold, J.) denying his motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of a stop for a motor vehicle violation. We affirm.
The trial court found or the record of the suppression hearing supports the following. On or about the evening of February 1, 2007, Sergeant Stan Andrewski of the Claremont Police Department stopped the defendant after observing him make two turns without signaling. In…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Arizona v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Muehler v. MenaSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- United States v. Daniel Dale HanlonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. PerriSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- State of New Hampshire v. Hillman Blesdell-MooreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- State v. BellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- In re BordaloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- State of New Hampshire v. Taneal C. BroadusSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.