Legal Opinion

People v. Lugashi

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 27, 1988No. B025012PublishedCited by 23 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ORTEGA, J.

Avraham Lugashi appeals from the judgment (order granting probation) entered following his conviction by the court of grand theft of more than $25,000, and four counts of receiving payment for items falsely represented to credit card issuers as having been furnished. (Pen. Code, §§ 487, subd. 1, 12022.6, 484h, subd. (b).) He contends: “I. The Trial Court Prejudicially Erred in Finding the Prosecution’s Foundational Showing Sufficient to Admit Wells Fargo Bank’s Computer-Generated Evidence Under Evidence Code Section 1271”; “II. Appellant Was Deprived of His State and Federal…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. United States v. Richard Allen De GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. American Oil Co. v. ValentiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  5. King v. State Ex Rel. Murdock Acceptance Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1969

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. BeelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. GoldsmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Aguimatang v. California State LotteryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. People v. HawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API