Legal Opinion
Lloyd v. Mukasey
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 31, 2008No. Civil Action 97-1287(PLF)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs motion to set aside the settlement agreement. 2 For the reasons explained below, the Court declines to approve the settlement agreement, and therefore will grant plaintiffs motion to set it aside.
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
The Court makes the following findings of fact:
Plaintiff Arthur Lloyd was a Deputy United States Marshal employed by the United States Marshals Service, a unit of the Department of Justice, for 24 years, first in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia and then in this Court. He brought…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Louis E. FULGENCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. RAY McDERMOTT & CO., Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Eugene Pierce v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co., D/B/A Santa Fe Railroad Co., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Makins v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Psaromatis v. English Holdings I, L.L.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- American Security Vanlines, Inc. v. Robert J. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- The CUNEO LAW GROUP, PC v. JosephDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Moses v. Howard University HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Cuneo Law Group, P.CDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009