Legal Opinion

Eichorn v. Schochie

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 12, 1923No. 23,197PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.

Plaintiff sold a Ford car to defendant for $600. The agreement was verbal. Two hundred dollars was paid dowD. Payment of the balance was deferred. Plaintiff claims defendant was to pay the whole amount within three months. Defendant claims he told plaintiff he expected soon to get the money, but if not, then he was to pay $35 a month. Plaintiff testified that it was agreed that he was to retain title to the car until paid for. Defendant in his testimony admitted this. Possession was delivered to defendant. After defendant had paid instalments amounting to $208, in addition to the initial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Porter v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
  2. Kruta v. LoughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Bergh v. SloanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Couch v. SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Usher v. EckhardtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API