Legal Opinion
Sickle v. Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, LLC
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 24, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-2224PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs David Sickle and Matthew Elliot (“Plaintiffs”) are former military subcontractors for Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, LLC (“Torres AES”). Plaintiffs maintain that Torres AES — acting through one of the principals, Scott Torres — improperly discharged them in retaliation for Elliot’s having lodged a workers’ compensation claim after he suffered a back injury while on the job. Plaintiffs have brought the instant action against Defendants Torres AES and Scott Torres (“Defendants”), alleging retaliatory…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sickle v. Torres Advanced Enter. Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- District No. 1, Pacific Coast District, Marine Engineers' Beneficial Association, Afl-Cio v. Liberty Maritime CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Rochon v. LynchDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Sickle v. Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020