State v. Dickinson

OPINION

THUMMA, Judge.

¶ 1 Defendant Zane Dickinson appeals his conviction and sentence for attempted second degree murder. Dickinson argues fundamental, prejudicial error because a jury instruction allowed the jury to return a guilty verdict upon a showing that he “[k]new that his conduct would cause ... serious physical injury,” rather than death. Concluding Dickinson has not met his burden to show prejudice from this fundamental error, his conviction and resulting sentence are affirmed.

FACTS 1 AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 For years, Dickinson and C.H., the victim, had been friends. In June…