Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Frantl Industries, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1976No. 706 (1974)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

Three issues are presented on this appeal:

1. Was it error for the trial court to exclude testimony and jury instructions on the Wisconsin Administrative Code provisions on flammable liquids ?

2. Did the trial court correctly restrict the special verdict inquiry on Crawford and the pipe company to whether he had ordered the welding operation ?

8. Should the trial court have directed a verdict finding Republic free from negligence?

Wisconsin Administrative Code.

Alumanation 801 is a thick liquid composed of mineral spirits, cutback asphalt, asbestos fiber and aluminum pigment. The first two…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jagmin v. Simonds Abrasive Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Strahlendorf v. Walgreen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Ryan v. CameronWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Merlino v. Mutual Service Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Carlson v. Drews of Hales Corners, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Merco Distributing Corp. v. Commercial Police Alarm Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Stewart v. WulfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Meurer v. ITT General ControlsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Olson v. RatzelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  5. Snider v. Northern States Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API