Legal Opinion
Plowman v. Arizona State Liquor Board
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 9, 1986No. 2 CA-CIV 5735PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIRDSALL, Judge.
The appellees, Richard Plowman and Concordaunt, Inc., are the holders of a Class 6 Arizona liquor license and operate an establishment in Tucson known as The Fine Line. They were charged in two different complaints with 23 counts of violations of Title 4, A.R.S. A panel of three members of the Arizona State Liquor Board heard evidence purporting to prove these allegations and found 20 of them to be true. Revocation of the license was recommended and ordered by the Board but subsequently stayed by the superior court. The decision of the panel was appealed to the superior…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- DeGroot v. Arizona Racing CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Podgor v. Indiana UniversityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Petras v. Arizona State Liquor BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Mayor & Council, City of Hapeville v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Sundown Imports, Inc. v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. Desert Valley Wood Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Siegel v. Arizona State Liquor BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Ethridge v. Arizona State Board of NursingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Smith v. Arizona Long Term Care SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Wieseler v. PrinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.