Legal Opinion
Commonwealth Bank & Trust Co. v. MacDonell
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 27, 1932No. 8917PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
It is conceded that Albert Urbahn is indebted to the Commonwealth Bank & Trust Company in the principal sum of $45,000, evidenced by his promissory note and secured by a concededly valid deed of trust lien upon a tract of 5,314 acres of land in Webb county, alleged to be of the value of $186,000.
The note matured on August 15, 1930, and Urbahn defaulted thereon. In pursuance of concededly lawful provisions of the deed of trust, the trustee in February, 1932, advertised the land for public sale to satisfy the debt secured.
Pending the advertised sale, appellee, Mary MaeDonell, brought this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carter Bros. & Co. v. HightowerTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Continental Trust Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Kokernot v. RoosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Delcambre v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Waples-Platter Co. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Justice Mortgage Investors v. C. B. Thompson Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Scarborough v. ConnellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Dunlap v. RotgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Lincoln Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. FreudensteinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Wodehouse v. Hawaiian Trust Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.