Legal Opinion

Dunlap v. Rotge

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 31, 1935No. 9837PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Justice.

The parties will be designated as plaintiff and defendants, as in the trial court.

Plaintiff brought this action for, and recovered, a money judgment and decree of foreclosure of a lien upon certain real property belonging to defendants, situated in Jim Wells county. From that judgment, defendants are prosecuting an appeal to this court, but have not sought to stay execution by filing supersedeas bond.

In this situation plaintiff procured issuance of execution, and order of sale, by virtue of which the sheriff levied upon and advertised the property for sale, as provided by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spark v. LasaterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Commonwealth Bank & Trust Co. v. MacDonellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Texaco Inc. v. Pennzoil Company, State of Texas, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  2. McKee v. City of Mt. PleasantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Bryan v. LuhningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Rogers Ranch Co. v. DarwinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Anderson v. Pioneer Building & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API