Legal Opinion
Thomas J. Palmer, Inc. v. Turkiye is Bankasi A.S.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 25, 1980No. Civ. 56588PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POTTER, Acting P. J.
Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the trial court quashing out-of-state service of summons upon defendant Turkiye Is Bankasi, a Turkish national bank (hereinafter referred to as Turkish Bank). The order, which was based on the court’s “opinion that the exercise of jurisdiction herein as against the defendant Turkiye Is Bankasi A.S. would be unreasonable” is expressly made appealable by Code of Civil Procedure section 904.1, subdivision (c).
The complaint names several defendants in addition to Turkish Bank. Its allegations are generally described in the opinion of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- California Bank v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lectrodryer v. SeoulBankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of the Western National Bank of Lovell, Wyoming v. British-American Insurance Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Paccar International, Inc. v. Commercial Bank of Kuwait, S.A.K.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Pacific Atlantic Trading Co. v. The M/V Main ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Ziller Electronics Lab GmbH v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.