Legal Opinion

United States v. Luce

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided January 25, 1984No. SPCM 18404PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WOLD, Senior Judge:

Appellant was convicted of unlawful sale of hashish in a contested trial before members. The Government’s case consisted primarily of the testimony of three witnesses: a drug suppression agent; a Special Agent Herndon; and a drug suppression agent; a Special Agent Herndon; and a confidential informant. The agent and the informant, testified that they met appellant in his barracks near the Charge of Quarters desk, then went to the basement where appellant sold hashish to the agent in the presence of the informant.

We are called upon to decide two issues:…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. BanksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  2. United States v. Donald F. Larson, United States of America v. Kenneth James CallahanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Medical Therapy Sciences, Inc., and Stanley BermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Napoleon B. LechocoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. CallahanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. ThompsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
  2. United States v. ArmstrongU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  3. United States v. VarelaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1986
  4. United States v. CobleNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API