Legal Opinion
United States v. Callahan
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 9, 1978No. Cr. 4-77-84PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL OR NEW TRIAL
DEVITT, Chief Judge.
Following verdicts of guilty to a one count indictment 1 charging violations of the kidnapping statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1201 (1970), defendants move for judgment of acquittal or for a new trial. They assert many grounds for the relief requested which are considered hereafter in the sequence of the case.
PROSECUTOR’S STATEMENTS TO THE GRAND JURY
Immediately prior to trial, defendant Callahan moved to dismiss the indictment as to him on the ground that the prosecutor informed the grand jury, prior to…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Donald F. Larson, United States of America v. Kenneth James CallahanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Pueblo v. Mendoza LozadaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1988
- State v. TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Berry v. Sch. Dist. of City of Benton HarborDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1981
- Soto v. LefevreDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.