Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Guidry v. Lafayette Health Ventures, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 20, 2016No. 15-307Published

1Concurrence

CONERY, J.,

concurs in the decision to reverse the jury’s zero verdict and concurs in part and dissents in part on the damages awarded and assigns reasons.

| ¶ Cognizant of the latest Louisiana Supreme Court ruling on the manifest error issue,1 I am nevertheless constrained to concur in the decision to reverse the jury’s finding of no damages in this case. Defendants stipulated to liability. The automobile collision occurred on the passenger side where Ms. Guidry was sitting, and though relatively minor, the collision was sufficient to have caused some aggravation of Kimberly Guidry’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grasser Contracting Co. v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Sher v. Lafayette Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  3. Clyde Snider, Jr., Et Ux v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
  4. Dore v. Mitsui Sumitomo Ins., USALouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Marshall v. BoydstonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API