Dore v. Mitsui Sumitomo Ins., USA
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CONERY, Judge.
Iiln this automobile accident case, Plaintiff, Melissa Dore, asserts that her accident with Defendant, Allan Johnson, caused her extensive injuries for which she claimed damages. After trial, the jury found Johnson was one hundred percent at fault for the accident, but also found that Dore was not entitled to any damages for her alleged injuries. The trial court then denied Dore’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) and alternative motion for a new trial. Dore appeals the jury’s verdict and trial court’s denial of her motions. For the following reasons, we…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Mart v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bailey v. LeblancLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Allgood v. BordelonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Bailey v. LeblancLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Calvin Joseph Guidry, Jr., Et Ux. v. Lafayette Health Ventures, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Derrick Leblanc v. American Alternative Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.