Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Boydston

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 17, 2010No. 09-1137PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge.

| plaintiff, Alexander Marshall, asserts that the trial court erred in this vehicle accident case by allowing the defendant’s expert to testify on issues outside his area of expertise, in finding that Mr. Marshall sustained only soft tissue injuries and awarding damages accordingly, in failing to award all medical expenses, and in failing to award damages for Mr. Marshall’s lost wages. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s judgment, except the award of medical expenses. Because we find that the trial court abused its discretion by denying expenses Mr.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  3. Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  4. Capo v. BlanchardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. LeBlanc v. StevensonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Reed v. LaCombeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Pennington v. Ochsner Clinic Found.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  3. Villa v. Geico Cas. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  4. Calvin Joseph Guidry, Jr., Et Ux. v. Lafayette Health Ventures, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Charles Allen Versus James Williams, Loreng Crouch, Affirmative Casualty Insurance Company and State of Louisiana, Department of Public Safety and CorrectionsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API