Legal Opinion

Gore v. myrtle/muller

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Decided February 10, 2005No. I.C. NO. 043566Published

1Opinion of the Court

This matter was reviewed by the Full Commission based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Gregory, and the briefs and oral arguments on appeal. The appealing party has shown good ground to reconsider the evidence. Having reconsidered the evidence of record, the Full Commission reverses the prior Opinion and Award, and enters the following Opinion and Award.

The Full Commission finds as facts and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties in a Pre-Trial Agreement:

STIPULATIONS

1. The parties are subject to the North Carolina…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Belfield v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Parker v. Thompson-Arthur Paving Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Wyatt v. SharpSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Glynn v. Pepcom Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API