Legal Opinion

McConnell v. Folsom Bros.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 25, 1908No. 1156PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Certiorari, from Berrien superior court — Judge Mitchell. March 26, 1908.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

Folsom Brothers procured the sanction of a petition for certiorari, which was duly filed, and the costs were paid and bond was given. The judge of the superior court sustained the certiorari and ordered a new trial. The plaintiff in error excepts to this judgment, upon the ground, among others, that no notice of the sanction of the certiorari and of the time and place of hearing had been given, as required by law, or waived. We do not deem it necessary to consider the other grounds of exception, or to determine whether the judgment sustaining the certiorari would have been correct if the case…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jones v. GillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. L. J. Glenn & Son v. ShearerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
  3. Franke v. MaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  4. Barnes v. Walker & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Bunn v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Morrison v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Hudson v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Peacock v. American Plant Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  4. Atlanta Woodenware Co. v. Franklin & RidleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  5. Goldberg v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API