Legal Opinion

Atlanta Woodenware Co. v. Franklin & Ridley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 5, 1912No. 4081PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Certiorari; from Pulaski superior court — Judge Martin. February 15, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

While the statute requires in express terms that the plaintiff in certiorari shall cause written notice to be given to the opposite party, his agent or attorney, of the sanction of the writ of certiorari, and also of the time and place of hearing', at least ten days before the sitting of the court to which the same is returnable, and that in default of such notice, unless prevented by unavoidable cause, the certiorari shall be dismissed (Civil Code (1910), § 5190), and while it has been repeatedly ruled by the Supreme Court and this court that this mandatory requirement as to notice must be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McConnell v. Folsom Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  2. Peoples Bank of Oliver v. AshCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  3. Glover v. Berry SchoolsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  4. Mathis v. Timmons, McWhite & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API