Legal Opinion

Rockwell International v. Turnbull

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 8, 1990No. 89CA2053PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge PLANK.

The petitioners, Rockwell International and Travelers Insurance Company, seek review of an order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) which determined that claimant, Robert E. Turnbull, sustained a compensable occupational disease as a result of toxic chemical exposure during the course of his employment. We affirm.

I

The petitioners argue that there is no competent evidence showing a causal connection between claimant’s occupational exposure to toxic chemical substances and the development of his disease, degenerative dementia. We disagree.

The claimant was not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. HavensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  2. Gelco Courier v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF STATEColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Krumback v. Dow Chemical Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Savio House v. DennisColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Valley Tree Service v. JimenezColorado Court of Appeals · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Metro Moving & Storage Co. v. GussertColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Arenas v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Delta Drywall v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Askew v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Dow Chemical Co. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API