Wheeler v. City of St. Helens
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBossman, J.
The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the circuit court erred when it sustained a demurrer to the complaint which was based upon a contention that the complaint did not state a cause of action. The complaint alleges that the charter of the defendant municipality confers upon its common council authority to prevent nuisances and remove obstructions from the public streets;' that within the city is a legally dedicated thoroughfare known as Plymouth street “which said Plymouth street was accepted by the city * * *; that between Sixteenth and Eighteenth streets said Plymouth street…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Peters v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Stendal v. BoydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Capp v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- Doyle v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
- Cox v. Alabama Water Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Blue v. City of UnionOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- Mark v. STATE, DEPT. OF FISH AND WILDLIFECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Welter v. M & M WOODWORKING CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Clark v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1952
- Maher v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.