Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. City of St. Helens

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1936PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBossman, J.

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the circuit court erred when it sustained a demurrer to the complaint which was based upon a contention that the complaint did not state a cause of action. The complaint alleges that the charter of the defendant municipality confers upon its common council authority to prevent nuisances and remove obstructions from the public streets;' that within the city is a legally dedicated thoroughfare known as Plymouth street “which said Plymouth street was accepted by the city * * *; that between Sixteenth and Eighteenth streets said Plymouth street…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Peters v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Stendal v. BoydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. Capp v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  4. Doyle v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Cox v. Alabama Water Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Blue v. City of UnionOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Mark v. STATE, DEPT. OF FISH AND WILDLIFECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Welter v. M & M WOODWORKING CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Clark v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1952
  5. Maher v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API