Legal Opinion
United States of America, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Thomas J. Carella, Daniel J. Domino and Joseph C. Erhart, Defendants
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 14, 1969No. 271-273, Dockets 32670-32672PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge:
After a jury trial before Chief Judge Henderson in the District Court for the Western District of New York, appellants Domino, Carella and Erhart were convicted of conspiring to rob a Buffalo branch of the Marine Midland Trust Company of Western New York, a bank insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 2113(a). At a previous trial the jury acquitted a codefendant and disagreed with respect to appellants.
Appellants complain of the court’s handling of a question that arose the morning after the jury had been selected…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Roberts v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. Angelo Pepe and Thomas Miglionico, United States of America v. Albert Joseph Facchiano, Francis Santo, Paul SantoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. SomersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Ronald Lyles, Jesse Johnson, Carlos Holder and Benjamin Dunham, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.