Legal Opinion

Elias v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 21, 2013No. Case No. 12-CV-00421-LHKPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART, DENYING-IN-PART MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.

Hewlett-Packard Co. (“Defendant” or “HP”) moves to dismiss Plaintiff David Elias’s Second Amended Complaint based on Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 9(b). The Court found the motion to be appropriate for disposition without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-l(b), and vacated the hearing set for May 9, 2013. Having considered the submissions of the parties and the relevant law, the Court hereby GRANTS-IN-PART and DENIES-IN-PART Defendant’s Motion to…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  2. In re Horizon Organic Milk Plus Dha Omega-3 Marketing & Sales Practice LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
  3. In re Apple Inc. Device Performance Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  4. Rasmussen v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  5. McCoy v. Nestle USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API