Elias v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART, DENYING-IN-PART MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.
Hewlett-Packard Co. (“Defendant” or “HP”) moves to dismiss Plaintiff David Elias’s Second Amended Complaint based on Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 9(b). The Court found the motion to be appropriate for disposition without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-l(b), and vacated the hearing set for May 9, 2013. Having considered the submissions of the parties and the relevant law, the Court hereby GRANTS-IN-PART and DENIES-IN-PART Defendant’s Motion to…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- In re Horizon Organic Milk Plus Dha Omega-3 Marketing & Sales Practice LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
- In re Apple Inc. Device Performance Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Rasmussen v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- McCoy v. Nestle USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.