Legal Opinion
Haase v. Haase
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 11, 1985No. C5-84-1699PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment on a subrogation claim brought by an employer and its workers’ compensation insurer against a third-party tortfeasor after a Naig settlement was entered into between the injured employee and the tortfeasor. Appellants contend the verdict of permanent disability was not supported by the evidence, and that the judgment improperly included a sum for workers’ compensation benefits payable in the future. We affirm.
FACTS
On February 11, 1978, Robert Thomas was driving a tractor-trailer owned by his employer, Dahlman, Inc., on an interstate…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Naig v. Bloomington SanitationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Lang v. William Bros Boiler & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Young Ex Rel. Young v. HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Wilken v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Folstad v. EderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Harry N. Ray, Ltd. v. First National Bank of Pine CityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- United Steelworkers, Local 6115 v. Quadna Mountain Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Folstad v. EderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991