Legal Opinion

Folstad v. Eder

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 5, 1991No. C6-90-585Published

1Opinion of the Court

467 N.W.2d 608 (1991)

Donna Jean FOLSTAD, n/k/a Donna Jean Fairbanks, Respondent,

v.

Nancy Irene EDER, et al., Petitioners, Appellants.

No. C6-90-585.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

April 5, 1991.

Thomas A. Harder, Jardine, Logan & O'Brien, St. Paul, for appellants.

Douglas E. Schmidt, Sieben, Grose, Von Holtum, McCoy & Carey, Ltd., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

SIMONETT, Justice.

If, prior to trial of the employee's tort action, the employer-insurer settles its subrogation claim with the defendant tortfeasor, does either the allocation formula of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Naig v. Bloomington SanitationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Henning v. WinemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Kempa v. E.W. Coons Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Folstad v. EderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API