Legal Opinion

Ex parte Thompson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1898PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Application by the grievance committee of the State Bar Association for the revocation of the license-of C. C. Thompson.

1Per curiam

This is a proceeding to disbar art attorney, instituted upon the relation of the members of the grievance committee of the Oregon Bar Association. The information charges that 0. 0. Thompson, a licensed attorney, was indicted, tried and convicted of a felony, viz., the crime of larceny by bailee and thereupon sentenced to imprisonment in the-penitentiary, and prays that he may be required to-answer the accusation, and upon proof thereof that he be disbarred from practicing his profession in this, state. An order requiring the accused to answer the charges on or before a day therein stated was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MasonOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Scott v. Van AlstyneNew York Supreme Court · 1812

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re the Disbarment of BurnetteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Application of HarperSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CoeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. In Re W. Marvin CliftonSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  5. In Re HaddadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API