Legal Opinion

Halbert v. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1864PublishedCited by 40 opinions

APPEAL from the Martin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

This was an action against Halbert and his sureties on his official bond as treasurer of Martin county. The condition of the bond was that Halbert should “ faithfully and impartially discharge his duties as treasurer of Martin county, and pay over all moneys according to law that might come into his hands as such treasurer.”

There were three breaches assigned.

1st. That Halbert received, while in office, 8000 dollars be- , longing to the common school fund, which he failed to pay over.

2d. That he received 3000 dollars on account of township taxes, which he failed to pay over.

3d. That he…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. Muzzy v. ShattuckCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  3. Snelson v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Board of Commissioners v. SaundersIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Coman v. State ex rel. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1837

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Graham v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Perley v. County of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Tillinghast v. . MerrillNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Wiley v. City of SpartaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  5. Bush v. Johnson CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API