Legal Opinion
Hakimoglu v. Trump Taj Mahal Associates
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 23, 1994No. Civ. No. 93-2084(JBS)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMANDLE, District Judge:
This matter comes before the court upon the motion of defendants for reconsideration of Parts II.C and II.D of this court’s Opinion and Order filed March 31, 1994, in which we dismissed plaintiffs claim for failure to state a claim under New Jersey’s common law doctrine of dram-shop liability. The underlying case is an action in tort to recoup gambling losses allegedly suffered by plaintiff in excess of $2,000,000 as a result of gambling in defendants’ casino while visibly intoxicated. Plaintiff Ayhan Hakimoglu filed a complaint against defendants 1 alleging…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Alexander v. Cigna Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Naporano Iron & Metal Co. v. American Crane Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Ayhan Hakimoglu v. Trump Taj Mahal Associates Trump Taj Mahal, Inc. Donald Trump the Trump Taj Mahal Corporation Tm/gp Corporation. Ayhan Hakimoglu v. Boardwalk Regency CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Polizzi Meats, Inc. v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- UTI Corp. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.