Legal Opinion

Gehring v. Gehring

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 2, 1941PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for entry of judgment for accrued alimony reversed on the law and facts as a matter of discretion and motion granted so as to allow plaintiff to enter judgment for alimony accruing after April 4, 1940, without costs of this appeal to either party. Order denying defendant’s cross-motion to strike from the decree the provision for the payment of alimony affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: While the release was void, the parties treated it as valid and relied on it for some years following its execution. The court found that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Durlacher v. DurlacherNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Hayes v. . HayesNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Gehring v. GehringNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Waddey v. WaddeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. Waddey v. WaddeyNew York Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Axelrad v. AxelradAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  2. Friedman v. ExelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Treherne-Thomas v. Treherne-ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  4. McCanliss v. McCanlissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  5. Di Giacomo v. Di GiacomoNew York Supreme Court · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API