Legal Opinion

McCarl v. Cox

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 2, 1925No. 4287PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a decree in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, restraining appellants from deducting from the salary of the appellee, a Commander in the United States Navy, the sum of $1,754.85, which the appellant MeCarl, as Comptroller General, conceived to represent improper payments of allowances; appellee insisting that those allowances were properly made. By stipulation of counsel, the ease was heard upon the pleadings, “as upon hill and answer.”

The first question presented is whether the Comptroller General is clothed with authority to collect, by way of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Smith v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1917
  3. Dillon v. GroosDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1924
  4. United States v. OlmstedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  5. Mare v. AlexanderDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1924

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  2. United States v. Eugene A. TafoyaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  3. Greene County Planning Board v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  4. Greene County Planning Board v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  5. McCarl v. PenceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API