Legal Opinion
Town of East Hartford v. Patricia Harris
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 4, 1980No. 78-1575PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This appeal requires us to determine whether the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) complied with the requirements of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, 42 U.S.C. § 5301-5317 (1976) (“HDCA”) in disapproving the application of the Town of East Hartford for a block grant. Section 5304(f) of Title 42 provides that an application for a block grant is “deemed approved” unless the Secretary informs the applicant of his disapproval within 75 days of receipt of the application. 1 East Hartford disputed the means by which HUD calculated the beginning and ending dates for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Power Reactor Development Co. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Federal Trade Commission v. Brigadier Industries Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Flanders v. Waterloo Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Reeves v. American Optical Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1976
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Vanguard Corporation v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- League of Women Voters of the United States v. NewbyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Archdiocese San Salv. v. FM Inter’lDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2006
- Weisburgh v. NH Savings Bank Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993