Legal Opinion

American Vanguard Corporation v. Jackson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 17, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2010-1459PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Last Autumn, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA” or the “Agency”) issued a Stop Sale, Use or Removal Order (“SSURO”) to plaintiff American Vanguard Corporation (“AMVAC”). The SSURO instructed AMVAC to cease the manufacture and distribution of a pesticide marketed by the company to golf courses throughout the United States, and mandated that the company destroy all remaining stockpiles of the product. EPA insists that AMVAC was selling a pesticide that deviated from the formula registered with, and approved by, the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Martin v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
  5. Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. League of Women Voters of the United States v. NewbyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  2. 3nod Digital (Hong Kong) Limited v. United States Department of StateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
  3. American Vanguard Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
  4. Broadgate, Inc. v. Secretary, Department of LaborDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API