Legal Opinion

Slate v. Boone County Abstract Company

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 14, 1968No. 53400PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK D. CONNETT, Jr., Special Judge.

This is a suit for damages in the amount of $16,200 brought by the buyers of land against an abstract company. The buyers, Donald and Adelia Slate, allege in their petition that they were damaged as a result of the Boone County Abstract Company’s negligent failure to include a utility easement in an abstract of title for a tract of land prepared and certified by the abstracter and delivered by it to the buyers at the request of the sellers of the land. Defendant abstracter contended in a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ petition that the contract to prepare…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis ex rel. Glencoe Lime & Cement Co. v. Von PhulSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  2. Westerhold v. CarrollSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. Ellis v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. Whitmore v. TatumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  5. Rogers v. GosnellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Williams v. PolgarMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1986
  3. Aluma Kraft Manufacturing Co. v. Elmer Fox & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Chmieleski v. City Products Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Stewart v. Gainesville Glass Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API