Legal Opinion

Westerhold v. Carroll

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 11, 1967No. 52480PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOCKARD, Commissioner.

Plaintiff has appealed from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis sustaining a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s petition on the ground that it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.yL

We shall summarize portions of the petition, but shall quote other portions when necessary to set forth plaintiff’s claim.

On May 6, 1959, Westerhold Construction, Inc. (hereafter referred to as “contractor”) entered into a written agreement (hereafter referred to as the “construction contract”) with the Archdiocese of St. Louis of the Catholic Church…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  5. Roddy v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Hoover's Dairy, Inc. v. Mid-America Dairymen, Inc./Special Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. L.A.C. Ex Rel. D.C. v. Ward Parkway Shopping Center Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. Curt Peters and Cheri Peters v. Wady Industries, Inc., and Patrick TerrioSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  4. Chubb Group of Insurance Companies v. C.F. Murphy & Associates, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. White v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API