Legal Opinion
Adams v. Farmers Insurance Group
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 28, 1999No. 98SC42PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
The petitioners, Michelle Adams and Chris Williams, seek review of a court of appeals opinion denying them statutory attorney fees following an action in which they were awarded personal injury protection (PIP) benefits under the Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act, sections 10-4-701 to 10-4-726, 3 C.R.S. (1998) (No-Fault Act or Act). Specifically, the ■ petitioners argue that the court of appeals erred in holding that a trial court may not grant attorney fees to a successful party absent a predicate factual finding that the PIP benefits were “overdue.” Petitioners further emphasize the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Harding v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Hock v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Walgreen Co. v. CharnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Crandall v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- Giampapa v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- Agritrack, Inc. v. DeJohn Housemoving, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Archibold v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Goodwin v. Homeland Central Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.