Legal Opinion

Porter v. United States Capitol Police Board

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 20, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2010-0992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.

Plaintiffs are nine officers in the Library of Congress Police who were transferred to the U.S. Capitol Police pursuant Congress’s merging of the two forces. 1 Under this merger, LOC police who met certain requirements were transferred to the USCP as officers. All other LOC police, including Plaintiffs, were transferred as civilians. Plaintiffs filed this suit against the U.S. Capitol Police Board, alleging that the merger unlawfully stripped them of their police powers on account of their age. In addition, Plaintiffs contend that the Act…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gresham v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Swanson v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. Prewitt v. McDonoughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API