Legal Opinion
Gresham v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 5, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2011-1178PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Re Document No.: 38
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting Defendant’S Motion For Summary Judgment
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Melvin Gresham brings this employment discrimination action against his employer, the District of Columbia (“District”), alleging claims under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is the District’s motion for summary judgment, on the grounds that, inter alia, this case is barred by res judicata. See ECF No. 38. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant the District’s motion.
II. FACTUAL…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ashbourne v. HansberryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Geter v. United States Government Publishing OfficeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Swanson v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Carr v. SessionsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Johnson, Jr. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.