Scowden v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OGG, Judge.
This appeal presents two issues. Did the Industrial Commission abuse its discretion when it entered an order disapproving of petitioner Arthur N. Scowden’s petition for a lump sum commútation of his industrial award?
Did the Commission fail to exercise its affirmative statutory duty to either ap*82prove or disapprove of petitioner’s request for a lump sum commutation?
On November 24, 1972, the Commission entered its original Findings and Award for Unscheduled Permanent Partial Disability, finding that petitioner has sustained a compensable industrial disability resulting in a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Micucci v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Prigosin v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Rutledge v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Daniels v. Bayless Stores, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lane v. Levi Strauss & Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Siegel v. Arizona State Liquor BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Savage Welding Supplies v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Rabago v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Schneidewind v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.