Daniels v. Bayless Stores, Inc.

LOCKWOOD, C. J.-

— Kate Daniels, hereinafter' called petitioner, has appealed from an award of the Industrial Commission of Arizona, hereinafter called the commission, denying her an adjustment of compensation.

There are but two questions for us to consider on the appeal. The first is the contention of petitioner that the award is invalid for the reason it is only signed by two commissioners. Her position apparently is that under the provisions of section 1393, Revised Code 1928, it is only in case a vacancy exists in the commission that two members thereof constitute a quorum for the purpose…