State v. Sutton
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
SNYDER, PJ.
¶ 1. Wayne A. Sutton appeals from judgments of conviction and subsequent orders denying postconviction relief. He contends that his plea was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made because he was not advised of the potential punishment for his crimes. Sutton asserts that Wis. Stat. § 971.08(l)(a) (2003-04), 1 which directs a court to advise a defendant of "the potential punishment if convicted" prior to accepting a plea of guilty or no contest, requires a court to advise the defendant of the maximum term of initial confinement associated with a bifurcated sentence under…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. BangertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. BolligWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Warren v. SchwarzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. ColeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. ByrgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Patrick K. TourvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. QuarzenskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
- State v. LichtyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
- State v. Gerald D. TaylorWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. Gerald D. TaylorWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.