Legal Opinion

State v. Quarzenski

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 22, 2007No. 2006AP2509, 2006AP2510, 2006AP2511PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

¶ 1. Pursuant to a plea bargain, David C. Quarzenski agreed to plead guilty to multiple charges, and the State agreed to cap its sentencing recommendation at seven years. At the sentencing hearing, the State made its promised recommendation, but additionally asked the circuit court to impose periods of extended supervision and probation on certain of the charges. Quarzenski contends that this constituted a breach of the plea agreement and that his multiple counsel were ineffective by failing to object to the breach.

¶ 2. Based on the evidence presented at the Mach- ner 1 hearing, we conclude…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. MacHnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. FroehlichCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
  2. State v. HabramCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019
  3. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019
  4. State v. TrinrudCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019
  5. Stewart, Byron v. Boughton, GaryDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API