Legal Opinion

Stuart v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1985No. L.A. 32075PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT. *

This is a proceedihg to review a recommendation of the State Bar that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for one year, and that execution be stayed on certain conditions including a one-year probation period and passage of the Professional Responsibility Examination.

Petitioner was admitted to the practice of law in 1973. In 1977, he was privately reproved for encouraging a third party to cash two checks that petitioner drew but later failed to honor.

The present disciplinary proceedings arise out of petitioner’s representation of Angel Guzman in a personal…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Himmel v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Lewis v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Finch v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Van Sloten v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Calvert v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Matthew v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Colangelo v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Colangelo v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API