Legal Opinion

Matthew v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1989No. S008386PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review the recommendation of the Review Department of the State Bar Court that petitioner, Christopher M. Matthew, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years; that execution of the order of suspension be stayed; and that he be placed on probation for that period subject to certain conditions. We notified petitioner that we were considering the imposition of 60 days’ actual suspension as a condition of probation, and he then filed a petition for a writ of review.

Petitioner requests that we adopt in full the recommendation of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chefsky v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In Re KreamerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Alberton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Greenbaum v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Doyle v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Calvert v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hartford v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Colangelo v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Colangelo v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Hartford v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API