McKenzie v. Sternicki
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, C. J.
Suit was for damages caused by being struck by defendant’s automobile when plaintiff undertook to walk across a street. He appeals, from judgment non obstante veredicto for defendant..
Plaintiff stood on the north curb about 80 feet east from an intersection. Immediately south of him were 3 lanes for westbound vehicular traffic; beyond those 3 lanes, and slightly to his left, was a safety zone for streetcar passengers; beyond it were car tracks over which 1 lane, immediately south of the safety zone, was available for westbound traffic, and then lanes for eastbound traffic. The safety zone was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Staunton v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Gayden v. ArabaisMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Levine v. SchonbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Phillips v. MartenMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Lang v. GinsteMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ortisi v. OderferMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Douglas v. HolcombMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Levesque v. LaFortuneMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Erickson v. VendzahMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Persail v. MoseleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.