Legal Opinion

Staunton v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1951No. Docket 15, 16, 17, Calendar 44,784, 44,817, 44,818PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

These cases were tried together in circuit court and on stipulation the appeals have been consolidated. Plaintiffs’ causes of action arose from a traffic accident occurring in the city of Detroit on the 26th of November, 1946, about 6 o’clock in the evening. At the time the plaintiffs Mary Staunton and Mary Madeline, her 6-year-old daughter, were undertaking to cross the paved portion of Joy road at or near the intersection of that highway with Rutland avenue. It was their claim on the trial that they were struck and injured by a bus owned and operated by the defendant, and that the accident…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Winckowski v. DodgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Pearce v. RodellMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Budnick v. PetersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. White v. Herpolsheimer CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Holmes v. MersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lebel v. SwincickiMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Ortega v. LenderinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Weller v. ManchaMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Knoellinger v. HenslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Jakubiec v. HastyMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API