Legal Opinion
National Steel Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided January 11, 1996No. Consolidated Court No. 93-09-00616-ADPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
DiCarlo, Chief Judge:
In this action, National Steel Corporation, AK Steel Corporation, Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Gulf States Steel, Inc. of Alabama, Inland Steel Industries, Inc., LTV Steel Company, Inc., Sharon Steel Corporation, U.S. Steel Group A Unit of USX Corporation, and WCI Steel, Inc. (Domestic Producers) and Hoogovens Groep B.V. and N.V.W. (U.S.A.), Inc. (Hoogovens), contest the final results of the remand determination filed by Commerce pursuant to this court’s order in National Steel Corp. v. United States, 18 CIT 1126, 870 F. Supp. 1130 (1994)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Federal Mogul Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- National Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Acciai Speciali Terni S.P.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Chia Far Indus. Factory Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- National Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Krupp Thyssen Nirosta GMBH v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Krupp Thyssen Nirosta GMBH v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.