Legal Opinion

Castro v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)

Decided August 10, 2006No. 02-05-210-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIXON W. HOLMAN, Justice.

Appellant Hector Castro appeals his conviction for the offense of manufacture of methamphetamine in an amount of 4 grams or more, but less than 200 grams. After the trial court denied his motion to suppress the methamphetamine that was found in a bag in the front seat of a car in which Appellant was a backseat passenger, Appellant entered an open plea of guilty, and the trial court assessed punishment at sixty years’ confinement and a $1,000 fine, and gave him permission to appeal the ruling on the motion to suppress.1 In his sole issue on appeal, Appellant…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Castro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. Simmons v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
  3. Baron Dewyon Bostice v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2007
  4. Baron Dewyon Bostice v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2007
  5. Castro v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API