Legal Opinion

United States v. Diaz-Gomez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 3, 2012No. 11-50159PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge:

Humberto Diaz-Gomez (“Diaz”) challenges the district court’s application of the United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“U.S.S.G.”) § 2M5.2, arguing the court erred by finding that he did not qualify for a base offense level of 14 under subsection (a)(2) and by applying the base offense level of 26 under subsection (a)(1). Because the district court did not err in its application of § 2M5.2, we AFFIRM the court’s judgment.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In November 2010, Diaz pleaded guilty to two counts of violating 18 U.S.C. § 554 by: (1) attempting to export a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Mondragon-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Cisneros-GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Solis-CampozanoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Aziz MuthanaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fort Worth Transp. Auth. v. RodriguezTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  2. United States v. Christopher Daniel StinesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
  3. United States v. Christopher Daniel StinesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API